ENCALHE

abril 7, 2009

FREE AL-ZEIDI!! Atirador de sapato no Bush tem pena reduzida!

Patrimônio e Maravilha da Humanidade, inspirada no ato de Al-Zeidi
O Jornalista iraquiano Muntazer al-Zaidi [ Que Deus lhe abençoe, cuide e proteja! ], punido por ter tacado [ainda que não acertado ] um sapato no Bush [ veja: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDfr5ubQ8cQ ], teve sua pena rebaixada: de três para um ano de cadeia. A informação tá no site da Al Jazeera ( em inglês, you dumb peoples! )
Quem não tem cimitarra, vai de sapato mesmo! Saladino ficaria orgulhoso! Nós ficamos…

janeiro 1, 2009

Mais textos e artigos em inglês sobre a situação em Gaza: "The truth about those Hamas rockets", e mais

Filed under: Al Jazeera, Faixa de Gaza, Israel, Oriente Médio — Humberto @ 11:44 pm
The truth about those Hamas rockets
By Dennis Rahkonen
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Jan 1, 2009, 01:24
Five years ago, the Bush administration lied about weapons of mass destruction to dupe us into supporting an illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq.
A few days ago, Israel trotted out only an infinitesimally more credible excuse — the Hamas rockets case — as justification for its own murderous shock and awe in Gaza, a long-planned campaign perniciously aimed at ousting a “regime” that came to power via popular, democratic vote.
Yes, such rockets exist, but they’re little more than slingshots against Israel’s incredible military might, and they’re used out of desperation by Palestinians who’ve never been accorded the democratic space within which to gain redress of their eminently just grievances.
Israeli apologists have presented absurd propaganda about those devices.
We’ve been asked, for instance, what would we do if rockets were being launched on our homes in New York or Texas, from Canada or Mexico?
The proper answer is that, if those two nations had been unlawfully occupied or embargoed by the United States for 60 years of relentless oppression and repression, and if all attempts at peaceful change had been forcefully prevented or scuttled by the U.S., then such attacks would be an understandable, indeed a justifiable attempt at gaining intolerably deferred liberty.
Our appropriate response wouldn’t be to bomb the hell out of the nearest Canadian or Mexican city, but to collectively look into mirrors and earnestly ask ourselves, “What have we done wrong to incur their wrath?”
And then act to correct the situation.
Conscientious Israelis acknowledge that the Hamas rockets rationale is fraudulent. For instance, Jerusalem Post writer Larry Derfner has noted, “We don’t want to see how people in Gaza are living, we block it out of our minds — which, I suppose, is natural for a society at war, but which also keeps that war going longer than it might if we would recognize that Gaza is getting so much the worst of it.
“The [Palestinian] Kassam [rockets] have terrorized the 25,000 people in Sderot and its environs, but have caused very, very few deaths or serious wounds. By contrast, Israel has terrorized 1.5 million Gazans, locked them inside their awfully narrow borders, throttled their economy, and killed and seriously wounded thousands of them . . .
“This is crazy. Israel is the superpower of the Middle East, but because we still think we’re the Jews of Europe in the 1930s, or the Israelites under Pharaoh, we spend a lot more time fighting our enemies than we might if we looked at the whole picture, not just our half of it . . .”
As Gazan hospitals and morgues fill beyond capacity because of an ongoing air assault that cruelly began at precisely the hour when countless children were heading home from school, we’re expected to believe that small craters mostly in empty Israeli fields constitute this terrible episode’s chief sin.
Bugs bothered by sporadically impacting, glorified fireworks cobbled together in backyard garages are ludicrously supposed to be the primary problem, not human limbs and lives shattered by the most destructive weapons that military science can produce!
At any point during the past six decades, Israel could have had peace, simply by assenting to the great moral imperative of our time, namely the Palestinians’ right to their own, unitary, sovereign homeland.
Something which Israel continues to resist tooth and nail.
Two years ago, in Southern Lebanon, Israel engaged in similar bombings in civilian areas. Then, too, it maintained that only “terrorist” targets were being hit. As impartial observers finally ascertained the truth, clear evidence of enormous civilian carnage surfaced.
The Israeli leadership lied then, and it’s lying now.
There’s a veritable holocaust occurring in densely packed Gaza. Think Guernica, or the Warsaw Ghetto, with all the searing irony that comparison involves.
Apart from being an ethical travesty offending all decent hearts, it’s an unpardonable outrage to especially Arab/Islamic peoples around the world.
Witness the angry demonstrations in cities across the planet.
It takes no extraordinary analytical prowess to appreciate that, when the White House ridiculously blames what’s currently happening on “thugs” in Gaza, and when moderate Arab states adopt an accommodationist position pleasing the U.S. and Israel, a profound Arab/Islamic radicalization billows and swells.
New Osama bin Ladens are being born as innocents in Gaza are getting ripped to death by American-made Hellfire missiles, dispatched toward fleshly targets by Israeli pilots.
In fact, the almost certain, counterproductive outcome of Israel’s action makes us necessarily suspect that secret motives mistakenly judged by Tel Aviv to be worth the risk are actually at play.
Three possibilities spring immediately to mind:
1) Obscenely using de facto genocide to give the present Israeli government a “tough” image before upcoming national elections.
2) Roping Barack Obama into a harder pro-Israeli stance than Tel Aviv fears he’d otherwise take.
3) Creating a manipulated, intensely propagandized situation that would enable a desired Israeli attack on Iran.
Whatever the most deeply hidden reality, Israel’s gargantuan crime must be universally condemned in the strongest possible terms . . . and halted at once!
Dennis Rahkonen of Superior, Wisconsin, has been writing progressive commentary with a Heartland perspective for various outlets since the ’60s.
US military aid underpins Gaza offensive – 31 Dec 08
Israel receives billions of dollars in military aid from the US each year, much of it spent on American weaponry which US law says must only be used in self-defence.But experts say there is little chance of cuts in aid to Israel despite its military operation in Gaza.
Al Jazeera’s Nick Spicer reports.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F91XF6bSDRQ

maio 19, 2008

Ataque dos EUA no Iraque que vitimou dois jornalistas em 2003 foi deliberado

Filed under: Al Jazeera, EUA, George W.Bush, Iraque, jornalistas — Humberto @ 3:38 am
Redação Portal IMPRENSA
Adrienne Kinne, uma ex-sargento do Exército dos Estados Unidos, revelou ao site Democracy Now! ter visto documentos militares secretos que listavam o Hotel Palestina, no Iraque, como possível alvo.
A declaração põe em cheque a justificativa norte-americana de que o ataque que vitimou os jornalistas Jose Couso e Taras Protsyuk, em 8 de abril de 2003, foi um acidente.
A ex-sargento garantiu ainda que recebeu ordens para vigiar norte-americanos que trabalhassem para órgãos de comunicação social e organizações não-governamentais e estivessem trabalhando no país.
Perante estes dados, a Federação Internacional de Jornalistas (FIJ) instou o governo dos EUA a “dizer toda a verdade” sobre a morte de jornalistas por soldados norte-americanos, uma vez que “lentamente a terrível verdade sobre os acontecimentos daquele dia estão vindo à tona”.
A necessidade de uma revelação total é ainda mais urgente, na medida em que uma decisão de um tribunal espanhol na última terça-feira (13) invocou a “insuficiência de provas” como base para abandonar um processo judicial contra três oficiais norte-americanos – o sargento Thomas Gibson, o capitão Philip Wolford e o tenente-coronel Philip de Camp – acusados da morte de Jose Couso.
A FIJ lembrou também que há dois outros casos para serem esclarecidos: o ataque norte-americano às instalações da Al Jazeera em Bagdá, que matou o repórter Tareq Ayyoub na manhã de 8 de abril de 2003; e as mortes de Terry Lloyd, Fred Nerac e Hussein Osman, membros de uma equipe de reportagem da ITN que acompanhava o início da guerra em Basra.
As informações são do site do Sindicato de Jornalistas de Portugal

Tema: Silver is the New Black. Blog no WordPress.com.

Seguir

Obtenha todo post novo entregue na sua caixa de entrada.